Yan Ying leads by 8.5 pts · 2 figures compared

Politician · Ancient

Politician · Ancient
Darius I appointed his brother Artaphernes as satrap of Lydia, a key province in western Anatolia. He administered the satrapy from Sardis, overseeing the collection of tribute and maintaining Persian control over the Greek city-states of Ionia.
Artaphernes received an Athenian embassy seeking Persian support against Sparta. He demanded earth and water as tokens of submission, which the Athenians gave. This agreement briefly made Athens a Persian ally, though it later contributed to the Persian Wars.
Artaphernes, as satrap of Lydia, played a key role in suppressing the Ionian Revolt against Persian rule. He coordinated military operations with the Persian fleet and reimposed Persian authority over the rebellious Greek cities, including the sack of Miletus.
Yan Ying became a high-ranking minister in the state of Qi under Duke Jing. He was known for his frugality, living in a modest house and wearing plain clothes, and for his diplomatic missions to other states.
Yan Ying represented Qi at the court of Chu, where he was mocked for his short stature. He responded with witty retorts that defended Qi's honor, a story recorded in the 'Yanzi Chunqiu' and celebrated for its cleverness.
Yan Ying counseled Duke Jing to reduce taxes, avoid extravagance, and care for the people. His advice emphasized moral leadership and frugality, influencing Qi's policies during a period of relative stability.
Each figure is scored on 6 dimensions (0—100 scale) based on structured historical data: Military (10%), Political (20%), Influence (20%), Legacy (20%), Leadership (15%), Strategy (15%). The weighted total produces the final ranking.
Scores are computed from structured sub-indicators in the database. Scale factors adjust for era (Ancient ×0.85, Modern ×1.0) and civilization size (Eastern ×1.05, Other ×0.80) to account for differences in population and military scale.
Comparisons are limited to 2—3 figures to ensure readability and statistical meaningfulness.
±5 points per dimension — Sub-scores are derived from historical records with inherent uncertainty. Two figures within 5 points on a dimension should be considered roughly equivalent in that area.
±3 points overall — The weighted combination of 6 dimensions produces a total score with approximately ±3 points of uncertainty. Differences of less than 3 points are not statistically significant— the figures are effectively tied.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!