Lu Xiufu vs Niccolo Machiavelli

Lu Xiufu was appointed as chancellor of the Southern Song after the fall of the capital Lin'an to Mongol forces. He served the fleeing Song court, attempting to organize resistance against the advancing Mongol army.

Lu Xiufu escorted the child Emperor Bing to Yamen in Guangdong after the death of Emperor Duanzong. He continued to lead the Song government-in-exile, maintaining the pretense of imperial authority despite the dire military situation.

After the Song fleet was defeated by the Mongols at the Battle of Yamen, Lu Xiufu, seeing no hope of escape, strapped the eight-year-old Emperor Bing to his back and jumped into the sea, drowning both. This act ended the Southern Song dynasty.

Machiavelli was appointed Second Chancellor of the Florentine Republic, responsible for diplomatic correspondence and military affairs. This position gave him firsthand experience in statecraft and diplomacy, which later informed his political writings.

Machiavelli was sent as an envoy to Cesare Borgia, observing his ruthless consolidation of power in Romagna. Borgia's cunning and decisiveness deeply impressed Machiavelli, later serving as a model for the ideal prince in his writings.

Machiavelli advocated for and helped create a citizen militia to replace mercenary forces in Florence. He recruited and trained infantry from the countryside. The militia performed poorly in battle against the Spanish in 1512, leading to its dissolution.

After the Medici family returned to power in Florence, Machiavelli was dismissed from his post, accused of conspiracy, imprisoned, and tortured. He was later exiled to his estate near San Casciano, where he began writing his major works.

Machiavelli wrote The Prince, a political treatise advising rulers on acquiring and maintaining power. The book advocated pragmatic, often amoral strategies, such as being feared rather than loved. It became a foundational text of modern political science and sparked lasting controversy.

Machiavelli wrote Discourses on Livy, a commentary on Roman history that advocated republican governance, civic virtue, and checks on power. This work contrasted with The Prince, showing his support for republican ideals and influencing later democratic thought.